Conspiracy rant part 1: This is what hot steel looks like
April 3, 2007 at 2:21 am (Conspiracy, Life, Politics, Rant, Thoughts)
Fire can melt metal if all the conditions are met. Have you noticed the furnace in this video? Have you noticed the size of the metal rod and how long it took to bend? Have you noticed how the metal rod still had a distinct shape after being toasted? Now ask yourself, what does it take to melt beams like those that used to be in the World Trade Center?
Rosie O’Donnell spoke about the conspiracy theory on 9/11 about building 7 that, despite the fact that no plane had hit this building, collapsed on itself just because of a fire… and she’s right about this, first time it ever happened… but that’s beside the point. The fact that the world trade center has been destroyed by terrorists or by Bush himself is irrelevant, what matters the most is “why did it happened?” The news didn’t talked a lot about that but 9/11 happened for a reason, it’s not just because of the Afghans ( It takes two to start a fight ) so what happened? From the little that I could find it apparently all happened because there was a US millitary occupation going on in some part of the middle east because of the undying conflict in this part of the world and the peoples there got angry ( Would you be angry if I sent a group of armed men camping in your backyard? I hope so ) but why did Bush sent millitary forces into Afghanistan before 9/11? To help… yeah… right! Did 9/11 caused anything beside the death of 2,750 people? Few of you know that it was all it took to start the war on terror and the war on terror just happen to be the war on the people around the oil…
So from one hand you have the terrorists who wants to defend their territory ( probably because of all the oil there ) and on the other hand you have Bush who presumably plotted the whole thing to get his hand on the oil… why is everyone interested in that damned oil?
MONEY!
Capitalism ( yes that’s your system ) has failled society and resemble more and more like imperialism and the result of all this can be best described as an ocean of lies. Wake up, whatever made you think that paper was so valuable? You buy things that was made by people who have no interest in making those objects, with the knowledge that it’s going to break on purpose after a while so that you will have to buy it once more knowing that they could have build it to last for your lifetime at half the price they charge and you dont even react… how pathetic is that?
It’s time to move on and evolve a little, think things through and make a new start. You think I’m the only one with ideas like this… wrong again Sherlock.
It’s time to give back to Caesar what belong to Caesar.
Aramax said,
April 3, 2007 at 1:24 pm
What im saying is that even a small hollow tube of steel is not that flexible. The steel in the world trade center was strong and much bigger then what is pictured in that video in my post and to melt the way it did… at that speed is just imposible.
8:46 a.m north tower gets hit.
9:03 a.m south tower gets hit
9:59 a.m south tower crumble
( That’s 56 minutes for fire to weaken multiple beams of steel probably twice as large as the desk you’re at all at the same speed to provoke a perfectly vertical collapse of a giant tower. )
10:28 a.m north tower crumble
( That’s 1 hour and 42 minutes for fire to weaken the exact same type of steel beams… compared to the other tower it took twice as much time… I guess they didn’t had any curtains in the north tower. )
5:20 p.m World trade center 7 crumble because it was too close to the north tower… odd… that’s not the info I had on that tower. WTC 6 was between WTC 7 and WTC 1 ( the north tower ).
All the towers felt the exact same way “pancake collapse” this fact alone should raise a series of questions.
And by the way, Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Corp… thats like reading FOX news so obviously they’re lying to protect their job there.
John D said,
April 4, 2007 at 3:07 pm
Sorry, you’re wrong. Anyone with common sense would see that shaping steel with a small, measly hammer cannot even remotely come close to reproducing what happened when a 400,000 lb. 767 aircraft going 250 knts slammed into the side of an extremely tall building. Also, you need to retake a basic physics high school course. Of COURSE the buildings fell like a pancake…The steel was WEAKENED, not melted, and thus when upper levels start falling, they put more pressure than the beams can support. Once one level falls, it collapses onto the other, thus increasing the weight forced upon lower levels. Weakened steel + excess weight is never a good combination, and unfortunately this pairing led to the demise of the WTC towers. I’m sorry, but I laugh at you, sir, not the other way around.
Aramax said,
April 4, 2007 at 8:20 pm
My father work for a metallurgical industry and I have seen the huge vats of molten steel when I was younger. If it would be so easy to bend or melt steel those guys would take their job less seriously.
Granted I dont have a Phd degree in advanced physics I still stand by what I said about the fact that it is strange that all 3 buildings collapsed exactly the same way ( pancake collapse ) just by the force of fire alone.
And you mentioned the airplanes slamming into the side of the buildings… wouldn’t such a factor affect the collapse of at least one of the two towers? Have you ever played block stacking games when you were younger? ( No it’s no different because the fire did not weaken the 4 corners of both towers at the same speed.
I will let the expert decide if it was a planned demolition or not but I will keep the memory of how misinformed and archaic some individual were back then. All that thanks to your comment.
=D
Beside the point I wanted to make had little to do with 9/11 if you read the whole article.
deadbouncer said,
April 20, 2007 at 12:18 pm
Makes you think though…
Dead Bouncer
http://deadbouncer.wordpress.com/
Googly Woogly said,
April 21, 2007 at 8:24 am
OMG CONSPIRACY